Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Harrington et al., Appellants, v. The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company et al., 1912 — 229 U.S. 607 · caselaw · US
General
George Harrington et al., Appellants, v. The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company et al.
229 U.S. 607·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 410.
George Harrington et al., Appellants, v. The Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Company et al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 2, 1912.
Decided May 5, 1912.
Mr. Frederick J. Stone and Mr. Alton B. Parker for the appellants.
Mr. Rush Taggart and Mr. John F. Dillon for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 326; Metropolitan Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519; Union Trust Co. of St. Louis v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 519.)