Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROBINSON et al. v. HUNTER et al., 1963 — 374 U.S. 488 · caselaw · US
General
ROBINSON et al. v. HUNTER et al.
374 U.S. 488·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROBINSON et al. v. HUNTER et al.
No. 5, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
L. W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for appellants.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.