General
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
371 U.S. 223·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 479.
Decided December 17, 1962.
Bryce Rea, Jr. and Frederick A. Babson, Jr. for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen and James L. Givan for appellee freight forwarders.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.