Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Marvin GREEN, petitioner, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 14 · caselaw · US
General
Marvin GREEN, petitioner, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General.
136 S. Ct. 14192 L. Ed. 2d 983·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marvin GREEN, petitioner,
v.
Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General.
No. 14-613.
Supreme Court of the United States
July 28, 2015.
Catherine M.A. Carroll, Esq., of Washington D.C. is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below. Briefs of other amici curiae in support of the judgment below to be filed within 7 day of the filing of the brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae .