Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City of Austin, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. C. Bartholomew et al., Receivers, 1902 — 187 U.S. 650 · caselaw · US
General
City of Austin, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. C. Bartholomew et al., Receivers
187 U.S. 650·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71.
City of Austin, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. C. Bartholomew et al., Receivers.
October 14, 1902.
Mr. 8. B. Fisher for the plaintiff in error. Ho appearance for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.
Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.