Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. Truskett, 1902 — 186 U.S. 480 · caselaw · US
General
Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. Truskett
186 U.S. 480·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 229.
Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. Truskett.
Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Argued April 18 and 21, 1902.
Decided April 28, 1902.
Mr. James Hagerman, Mr. Clifford L. Jackson and Mr. Joseph M. Bryson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Porter for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the court below, Railway Company v. Truskett, 104 Fed. Rep. 728, and cause remanded to the United States Court for the Northern District of the Indian Territory.