Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Costis TAKIS, Trading as the Goody Shop, Bankrupt; James B. Ford, Appellant, 1927 — 18 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Costis TAKIS, Trading as the Goody Shop, Bankrupt; James B. Ford, Appellant
18 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Before MANTON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Costis TAKIS, Trading as the Goody Shop, Bankrupt; James B. Ford, Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 25, 1927.
No. 376.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. .
Middlebrook & Sineerbeaux and W. E. Shrewsbury, all of New York City, for appellant.
A. Palmer and A. Rose, both of New York City, for appellees.
Before MANTON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and CAMPBELL, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed in open court.