Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Tupper Lake Water Company, Appellant, v. Charles H. Sisson et al., as Town Auditors of the Town of Altamont, Respondents, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Tupper Lake Water Company, Appellant, v. Charles H. Sisson et al., as Town Auditors of the Town of Altamont, Respondents
173 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Tupper Lake Water Company, Appellant, v. Charles H. Sisson et al., as Town Auditors of the Town of Altamont, Respondents.
People ex rel. Tapper Lake W. Go. v. Sisson, 75 App. Div. 138, affirmed.
(Argued January 6, 1903;
decided January 20, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 16, 1902, which confirmed a determination of the defendants rejecting a claim of the relator for water furnished to the town of Altamont.
John P. Badger for appellant.
John P. Kellas for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.