Contracts · MBE-tested

UNITED STATES v. FISHER

384 U.S. 212·Supreme Court of the United States·1966

Mr. Justice Harlan would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

UNITED STATES v. FISHER. No. 700. Decided May 16, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States. Joseph H. Stamler for appellee. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Harlan would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.