General
Daniel Sullivan, Plaintiff in Error, v. St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway Company
203 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 29.
Daniel Sullivan, Plaintiff in Error, v. St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway Company.
Argued October 16, 1906.
Decided October 22, 1906.
Mr. Floyd McGown and Mr. L. G. Denman for plaintiff in error: Mr. Reagan Houston and Mr. A. W. Houston for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Rosenbaum v. Bauer, 120 U. S. 450; Knapp v. Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, 197 U. S. 541.