Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sullivan et al. v. California, 1953 — 345 U.S. 955 · caselaw · US
General
Sullivan et al. v. California
345 U.S. 955·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 570.
Sullivan et al. v. California.
Kenyon C. Keller for petitioners. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Frank W. Richards, Assistant Attorney General, and William E. James, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District. Certiorari denied.