Contracts · MBE-tested
Arizona v. California et al.
459 U.S. 940·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,
Orig.
Arizona v. California et al.
[MAJORITY]
Joint motion for additional time for oral argument and for divided argument granted, and a total of one and one-half hours allotted for oral argument and no more than two counsel per side shall present oral argument.
Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 811.]