Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. Lewis E. Cole et al., Appellants, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Petition of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. Lewis E. Cole et al., Appellants
173 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate for the Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. Lewis E. Cole et al., Appellants.
Matter of Daly, 72 App. Div. 894, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 9, 1903;
decided February 17, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 9, 1902, which modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term setting aside the report of commissioners of appraisal.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the order appealed from was made in a special proceeding and is not a final order determining such proceeding.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Cownoly of counsel), for motion.
Isaac N. Mills opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, with costs, on the ground that the order is not a final determination of the proceeding.