Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 559 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al.
308 U.S. 559·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 218 and 219.
Thompson, Trustee, v. Terminal Shares, Inc., et al.
October 9, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mr. B. B. Caldwell for petitioner. Mr. William B. Cockley for Terminal Shares,. Inc. et al.; Messrs. Godfrey Goldmark and Henry N. Ess for Guaranty Trust Co. et ah; and Messrs. Clan Cramford, Benj. F. Fiery, and Howard F. Burns for Tomlinson et al., respondents.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.