Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Allaback, Respondent, v. George W. Utt, Appellant, 1873 — 51 N.Y. 651 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Jacob Allaback, Respondent, v. George W. Utt, Appellant
51 N.Y. 651·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur for affirmance, except Hunt, 0., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob Allaback, Respondent, v. George W. Utt, Appellant.
(Argued September 25, 1872;
decided January term, 1873.)
This was an action of trespass.
Plaintiff found defendant’s cattle trespassing upon Ms premises and took them into his possession. A few hours after defendant, against plaintiff’s remonstrances, threw down the fence of the latter and drove the cattle away. For this trespass the action was brought. It did not appear that the cattle did more than nominal damage. Held (Hunt, C., dissenting), that the trespass was willful, as the law authorized the detention of the cattle for twenty-four hours. While plaintiff so held them they were in the custody of the law, and the jury, therefore, were authorized to give exemplary damages.
D. Wright for the appellant.
O. Wood for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Hunt, C., Earl, C.,]
Hunt, C.,
reads for reversal.
Earl, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur for affirmance, except Hunt, 0., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.