Torts · MBE-tested
Catharine Hynds, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant
188 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catharine Hynds, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 15, 1907;
decided April 30, 1907.)
Hynds v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 111 App. Div. 339, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 8, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
J. R. Oeland, and George JD. Yeomans for appellant.
George V. Brower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ.