Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary A. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 559 · caselaw · US
General
Mary A. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
179 N.Y. 559·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary A. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Fitzgerald v. FT. Y. O. <& U. JR. R. R. Oo., 84 App. Div. 59, affirmed.
(Argued June 17, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered May 19, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term after a verdict had been rendered in favor of plaintiff and directing judgment for plaintiff on the verdict.
BLenry Purcell for appellant.
Virgil F. Kellogg for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not voting : Parker, Ch. J. Not sitting : Gray, J.