Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., 1963 — 372 U.S. 958 · caselaw · US
General
Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc.
372 U.S. 958·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 833.
Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc.
David Wolf and Charles Hieken for petitioners. Elliott I. Pollock for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to use the record in Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., No. 21, October Term, 1960 (365 U. S. 336), granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.