Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virginia JAMES, appellant, v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 1806 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Virginia JAMES, appellant, v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION.
134 S. Ct. 1806188 L. Ed. 2d 755·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virginia JAMES, appellant,
v.
FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION.
No. 12-683.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 7, 2014.
Case below, 914 F.Supp.2d 1.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for further consideration in light of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n, 572 U.S. ---- (2014).