Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Graham et al. v. United States; and Heed et al. v. Same, 1939 — 307 U.S. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Graham et al. v. United States; and Heed et al. v. Same
307 U.S. 643·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 891.
No. 901.
Graham et al. v. United States; and Heed et al. v. Same.
June 5, 1939.
Mr. Moses Polakoff for petitioners m No. 891. Mr. Lewis Landes for petitioners in No. 901. Solicitor General ■ Jackson, and Messrs. William W. Barron, J. Albert Woll, M., Joseph Matan, and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Reported below: 102 F. 2d 436.