Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benjamin Parr, Respondent, v. Noah Loder, Jr., Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
Benjamin Parr, Respondent, v. Noah Loder, Jr., Appellant
182 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benjamin Parr, Respondent, v. Noah Loder, Jr., Appellant.
(Argued May 29, 1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Parr v. Loder, 97 App. Div. 218, appeal dismissed.
Motion to dismiss an appeal taken by permission of a judge of the Court of Appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 15,1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that an appeal herein had been heretofore taken and dismissed by this court, with costs; that at the time of the application to the judge who granted permission to take the present appeal, the said costs were unpaid and, therefore, the defendant was stayed from making any motion or application to the Court of Appeals or to the judges thereof, and that the application to the Appellate Division for leave to appeal (which application had to be made there before leave could be granted by a judge of the Court of Appeals) was not made within the time required by section 1310 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Ralph Earle Prime, Jr., for motion.
Joseph W. Middlebrook opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, with ten dollars costs only.