Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rhodes E. Cave et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Missouri ex rel. James P. Newell, 1918 — 246 U.S. 650 · caselaw · US
General
Rhodes E. Cave et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Missouri ex rel. James P. Newell
246 U.S. 650·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 858.
Rhodes E. Cave et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Missouri ex rel. James P. Newell.
In error, to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Motion to dismiss submitted March 11, 1918.
Decided March 18, 1918.
Mr. George B. Webster, Mr. Elliott W. Major, Mr. Charles G. Revelle and Mr. Selden P. Spencer for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. George F. Haid and Mr. Frank H. Sullivan for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726; Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert, 245 U. S. 162; (2) Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586, 592; Taylor & Marshall v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548, 576.