Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Solomon Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph Wittner, Respondent, 1896 — 151 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Solomon Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph Wittner, Respondent
151 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Solomon Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph Wittner, Respondent.
Jones v. Wittner, 79 Hun, 283, affirmed.
(Argued December 10, 1896;
decided December 24, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
Adolph Oohen for appellant.
David Levmt/ritt and Harold Natha/n for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., and Bartlett, J., not voting.