Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Philip HURN and Percy Morgan, Jr., Complainants-Appellants, v. Fulton OURSLER, Lowell Brentano, Albert Lewis and Sam H. Harris, Defendants-Appellees, 1932 — 61 F.2d 1031 · caselaw · US
General
Philip HURN and Percy Morgan, Jr., Complainants-Appellants, v. Fulton OURSLER, Lowell Brentano, Albert Lewis and Sam H. Harris, Defendants-Appellees
61 F.2d 1031·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philip HURN and Percy Morgan, Jr., Complainants-Appellants, v. Fulton OURSLER, Lowell Brentano, Albert Lewis and Sam H. Harris, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 33.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 7, 1932.
Lorenz & Lorenz, of New York City (Joseph Lorenz, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Hays, St. John, Abramson & Sohulman, of New York City (Arthur Garfield Hays and Alan S. Hays, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Oursler.
O’Brien, Malevinsky & Driscoll, of New York City (Arthur P. Driscoll, Benjamin Pepper, and George D. Bradford, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Albert Lewis and Sam H. Harris.
Paul N. Turner, of New York City, for appellee Lowell Brentano.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on the authority of Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Co., 220 U. S. 446, 31 S. Ct. 456, 55 L. Ed. 536; Ingrassia v. A. C. W. Mfg. Corp., 24 F.(2d) 703 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. Expansion Bolt Co. v. Kroncke Hardware Co., 234 F. 868 (C. C. A. 7).