General
Bader v. Illinois; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. et al. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.
311 U.S. 610·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 158.
No. 189.
Bader v. Illinois. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. et al. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.
October 14, 1940.
Mr. WrrT. Scott 'Stewart for appellant in No. 158. Mr. Wm. M. Hall for appellants in No. 189. Messrs. John E. Cassidy, Attorney General' of Illinois, and A. B. Dennis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee in No. 158. Messrs. Mar-cellus Green and Garner W. Green for appellee in No. 189.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiany.]
Per Curiany.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals ate dismissed.' for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February .13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certio-rari, as required by §237 (c) of the Judicial • Cocíe’' (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is’" denied.
Reported below: No. 158, 372 Ill. 345 ; 23 N. E. 2d 691; No. 189, 189 Miss. 496; 195 So. 667.