Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McCullough v. Kammerer Corporation et al., 1944 — 322 U.S. 766 · caselaw · US
Corporations
McCullough v. Kammerer Corporation et al.
322 U.S. 766·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 836.
McCullough v. Kammerer Corporation et al.
June 5, 1944.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is granted. The order of May 8,1944, denying certiorari, 322 TJ. S. 739, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted.
Messrs. R. Welton Whann, A. W. Boyken, and Robert M. McManigal for petitioner.
Messrs. Frederick 8. Lyon and Leonard 8. Lyon for respondents.