Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward M. TIMMINS, Libelant Appellant, v. James C. DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (Erie Railroad), Respondent Appellee, 1926 — 11 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Edward M. TIMMINS, Libelant Appellant, v. James C. DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (Erie Railroad), Respondent Appellee
11 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward M. TIMMINS, Libelant Appellant, v. James C. DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (Erie Railroad), Respondent Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 19, 1926.)
No. 290.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and J. Dudley Eggleston, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Leo J. Curren, of New York City, for appellee.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of this Court are of opinion that the decree should be affirmed, with costs; and it is so ordered.