Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 1958 — 355 U.S. 950 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
355 U.S. 950·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 57.
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Henry Hammer, Henry H. Edens and William E. Chandler, Jr. for petitioner. Wesley M. Walker and Ray R. Williams for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 352 U. S. 999, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Argued January 28, 1958. This case is restored to the calendar for reargument. Counsel are asked to brief and argue the application of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64, in connection with question II of the questions presented in respondent’s brief, and point III of the points in petitioner’s reply brief.