Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
South Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 1966 — 382 U.S. 987 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
South Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
382 U.S. 987·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 647.
South Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Scott W. Lucas and Joseph B. Friedman for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lionel Kestenbaum and Henry Getter for Federal Communications Commission, and Robert A. Mar-met, Edwin R. Schneider, Jr., Paul A. Porter and Reed Miller for L. B. Wilson, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.