Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MT. MORRIS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. DORAN, Prohibition Com'r, 1929 — 36 F.2d 489 · caselaw · US
Corporations
MT. MORRIS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. DORAN, Prohibition Com'r
36 F.2d 489·United States District Court for the Southern District of New York·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MT. MORRIS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. DORAN, Prohibition Com’r.
District Court, S. D. New York.
June 19, 1929.
See also 36 F.(2d) 489.
Harry S. Hall and Bernard Kovner, both of New York City, for plaintiff.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., and U. S. Grant, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New York City, for defendants.
[MAJORITY — KNOX, District Judge.]
KNOX, District Judge.
The within petition is denied on the ground that there is no showing that the Prohibition Administrator has violated the injunction order of Judge Thaeher. As was held in Olivett Distributing Co. v. Bowers (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 318, the continuance in force of a basic permit does not carry with it an absolute right to the withdrawals specified therein. The issuance of withdrawal permits is within the discretion, to be exercised in good faith, of course, of the Administrator. From all that is before me, I am not satisfied that such discretion has been abused.
Furthermore, the proper procedure to correct any misconduct in the premises on the part of the Administrator is to review his aetion under section 6 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 16).