Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Midland Valley Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. Maude Griffith, Administratrix, etc., 1917 — 245 U.S. 633 · caselaw · US
General
Midland Valley Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. Maude Griffith, Administratrix, etc.
245 U.S. 633·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 601.
Midland Valley Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. Maude Griffith, Administratrix, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm and for damages submitted December 10, 1917.
Decided December 17, 1917.
Mr. L. T. Michener for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. L. Cunningham and Mr. C. T. Atkinson for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction with five per cent, damages, upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Carter, 244 U. S. 646. (Petition for a writ of certiorari denied October 15, 1917, infra, 653.)