Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Andrew G. Cooper et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Andrew G. Cooper et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent
160 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew G. Cooper et al., Appellants, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent.
(Argued June 8, 1899;
decided October 3, 1899.)
Cooper v. City of Brooklyn, 11 App. Div. 71, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 13, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at Special Term.
Albert A. Wray for appellants.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (William J. Carr, of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs ’; no opinion.
All concur.