Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JUNG SING, Appellant, v. M. A. COYKENDALL, District Director of Immigration, Appellee, 1929 — 34 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
JUNG SING, Appellant, v. M. A. COYKENDALL, District Director of Immigration, Appellee
34 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JUNG SING, Appellant, v. M. A. COYKENDALL, District Director of Immigration, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 25, 1929.
No. 5550.
Frank Doughmaa, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
Clint W. Hager, U. S. Atty., and Hal Lindsay, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause is affirmed.