General
Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co. et al.; and City of Colton v. Southern California Edison Co. et al.
375 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71.
No. 73.
Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co. et al.; and City of Colton v. Southern California Edison Co. et al.
Northcutt Ely and C. Emerson Duncan II on the motion. Harry W. Sturges, Jr. and Boris H. Lakusta for Southern California Edison Co., and J. Thomason Phelps for the Public Utilities Commission of California, respondents, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 372 U. S. 958, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The motion of the American Public Power Association for leave to participate in oral argument, as amicus curiae, is denied.