Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., et al. v. Resendis et al.; and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Herrera et al., 425 U. S. 991, 1977 — 431 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., et al. v. Resendis et al.; and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Herrera et al., 425 U. S. 991
431 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-720.
Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., et al. v. Resendis et al.; and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Herrera et al., 425 U. S. 991.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for rehearing granted and order of May 24, 1976, vacated. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and ease remanded for further consideration in light of East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez, ante, p. 395.