Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTHWESTERN UNION PACKET CO. v. HOME INSURANCE CO., 1872 — 154 U.S. 588 · caselaw · US
General
NORTHWESTERN UNION PACKET CO. v. HOME INSURANCE CO.
154 U.S. 58820 L. Ed. 463·Supreme Court of the United States·1872
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTHWESTERN UNION PACKET CO. v. HOME INSURANCE CO.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA.
No. 467.
Submitted January 19, 1872.
Decided January 29, 1872.
A writ of error to the highest court of a State must be allowed, either by a justice of this court, or a judge of that court.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. L. Adis for plaintiff in error.
Mr. George W. McCrary for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
,On looking at the record we find no allowance of a writ of error, either by a 'justice of this court or by a judge of the state court. We have repeatedly decided that such an allowance was necessary, upon a writ of error addressed to the highest court of the State, by which the judgment or decree could be rendered. Callan v. May, 2 Black, 541, 543; Twitchell v. The Commonwealth, 7 Wall. 321; Gleason v. Florida, 9 Wall. 779. The case of Davidson v. Lanier, 4 Wall. 447, 453, referred to by counsel for the plaintiff in error, was a writ of error addressed to an inferior court of the United States, and is therefore inapplicable.
The writ before us must be Dismissed.
The above was rescinded May 6, 1872, and writ of certiorari granted. The case was afterwards decided at December term, 1872, as No. 228. Argued and submitted and affirmed' April 18, 1873.