General
Harry Susman, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the School District of Pittsburgh
245 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 108.
Harry Susman, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the School District of Pittsburgh.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Argued January 2, 1918.
Decided January 14, 1918.
Mr. Andrew G, Smith, Mr. W. H. Dodds and Mr. Janies M. Beck for appellant.
Mr. J. Roger McCreary and Mr. Samuel S. Mehard for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Soliah v. Heskin, 222 U. S. 522; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.