Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clements v. Clements et al., 1939 — 305 U.S. 659 · caselaw · US
General
Clements v. Clements et al.
305 U.S. 659·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 546.
Clements v. Clements et al.
January 9, 1939.
Messrs. Alfred H. Myers and Albert Spievack for petitioner.
No appearance for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, 1st Appellate District, of Ohio, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.