Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ezra Eshelby et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William Watts, Judge, etc., et al., 1903 — 191 U.S. 564 · caselaw · US
General
Ezra Eshelby et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William Watts, Judge, etc., et al.
191 U.S. 564·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 123.
Ezra Eshelby et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William Watts, Judge, etc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error.
November 30, 1903.
Mr. Frank B. Kellogg for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. H. Steenerson for defendants in error.