Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles L. Harney Construction Co. (formerly Palm Springs Holding Corp.) v. Fleming, Administrator, Federal Works Agency, et al., 1949 — 338 U.S. 893 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Charles L. Harney Construction Co. (formerly Palm Springs Holding Corp.) v. Fleming, Administrator, Federal Works Agency, et al.
338 U.S. 893·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 392.
Charles L. Harney Construction Co. (formerly Palm Springs Holding Corp.) v. Fleming, Administrator, Federal Works Agency, et al.
Harold Leventhal, David B. Gideon and John J. Courtney for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant At torney General Vanech, Roger P. Marquis and Fred W. Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Larson, Administrator of General Services, substituted as the party respondent. Certiorari denied.