Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin M. Goldman v. United States; Shulman v. United States; and Theodore Goldman v. United States, 1941 — 314 U.S. 704 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Martin M. Goldman v. United States; Shulman v. United States; and Theodore Goldman v. United States
314 U.S. 704·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 962,
No. 963,
No. 980,
October Term, 1940.
Martin M. Goldman v. United States; Shulman v. United States; and Theodore Goldman v. United States.
October Term, 1940.
October Term, 1940.
October 20, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
The motion to defer consideration of the petition for rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing is granted. The order denying cer-tiorari, 313 U. S. 588, is vacated, and the petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted.
Messrs. Jeremiah T. Mahoney, Jacob W. Friedman, and Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and Louis B. Schwartz for the United States.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Reported below: 118 F. 2d 310.