Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Power Commission v. Wisconsin et al., 1954 — 346 U.S. 935 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Power Commission v. Wisconsin et al.
346 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 418.
Federal Power Commission v. Wisconsin et al.
Acting Solicitor General Stern and Willard W. Gatchell for petitioner. Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General, and Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin, William E. Torkelson for the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, David M. Proctor and Jerome M. Joffee for Kansas City, Missouri, James H. Lee for Detroit, Michigan, and Walter J. Mattison and Harry G. Slater for Milwaukee, Wisconsin, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The order entered November 30, 1953, denying certiorari, 346 U. S. 896, is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.