Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sanford v. Hill, Sheriff, 1942 — 316 U.S. 647 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Sanford v. Hill, Sheriff
316 U.S. 647·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1187.
Sanford v. Hill, Sheriff.
June 1, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Gorin v. United States, 312 U. S. 19, 27-28; Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Interna tional Alliance v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U. S. 437.
Mr. Bewail Myer for appellant.