Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max Meuer, Respondent, v. The Phenix National Bank, Appellant, 1905 — 183 N.Y. 511 · caselaw · US
General
Max Meuer, Respondent, v. The Phenix National Bank, Appellant
183 N.Y. 511·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Meuer, Respondent, v. The Phenix National Bank, Appellant.
(Argued October 17, 1905;
decided October 27, 1905.)
Meuer v. Phenix Nat. Bank, 94 App. Div. 331, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 21, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Richard F. Goldsborough and M'Cready Sykes for appellant.
Joel M. Marx and Lawrence Goldberg for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.