Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George S. Waters et al., as Co-partners under the Firm Name of Waters & Sherwin, Respondents and Appellants, v. Anna R. Gazzam, Appellant and Respondent, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
General
George S. Waters et al., as Co-partners under the Firm Name of Waters & Sherwin, Respondents and Appellants, v. Anna R. Gazzam, Appellant and Respondent
180 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George S. Waters et al., as Co-partners under the Firm Name of Waters & Sherwin, Respondents and Appellants, v. Anna R. Gazzam, Appellant and Respondent.
Waters v. Gazzam, 88 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Argued January 25, 1905;
decided February 21, 1905.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 9, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Robert Thorne for plaintiffs, respondents and appellants.
Frederick P. Bellamy for defendant, appellant and respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.