Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. Alfred King et al., Respondents, v. The German-American Bank of Buffalo, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
J. Alfred King et al., Respondents, v. The German-American Bank of Buffalo, Appellant
186 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. Alfred King et al., Respondents, v. The German-American Bank of Buffalo, Appellant.
King v. German-American Bank of Buffalo, 102 App. Div. 619, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 1, 1906;
decided October 9, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee. The motion was made upon the grounds that the appeal was frivolous, no questions of merit being involved therein.
Moses Shire for motion.
William C. Carroll opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.