Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TEXAS CONSOLIDATED THEATRES, INC. v. PITTMAN, 1938 — 305 U.S. 3 · caselaw · US
Tax
TEXAS CONSOLIDATED THEATRES, INC. v. PITTMAN
305 U.S. 383 L. Ed. 5·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TEXAS CONSOLIDATED THEATRES, INC. v. PITTMAN.
No. 26.
Submitted October 19, 1938.
Decided November 7, 1938.
Mr. W. B. Handley submitted for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Respondent recovered judgment for damages in an action for injuries suffered by his wife. After appeal had been argued and while it was under advisement in the Circuit Court of Appeals, the parties entered into a stipulation for settlement on payment of a sum less than the judgment and providing that the judgment should be reversed and judgment entered in the District Court for costs only. The. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. 93 F. 2d 21. Alleging that the court had been informed of the compromise and stipulation, petitioner sought a rehearing, which was denied. 94 F. 2d 203. We granted certiorari.
Upon the case being called for argument in this Court, respondent did not appear. Petitioner submitted a statement showing that, since the issue of the writ, an order upon hearing had been entered in the District Court whereby the judgment involved was decreed to be satisfied and discharged in full and the issue of execution thereon was prohibited; that respondent excepted to the order and gave notice of appeal but that the appeal had not been prosecuted.
Petitioner submitted the case for such order as the Court may deem proper and suggested that the costs of this proceeding may be taxed against it.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs against petitioner.
Dismissed.