Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Philip A. Decker, Appellant, v. Andrew Morton, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
Philip A. Decker, Appellant, v. Andrew Morton, Respondent
159 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philip A. Decker, Appellant, v. Andrew Morton, Respondent.
Decker v. Morton, 31 App. Div. 469, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 19, 1899;
decided June 23, 1899.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict, and an order-denying a motion for a new trial.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the appellant had failed to file a return or serve a case, and that a year had elapsed since the appeal was taken.
T. J. Molloy for motion.
Sol. A. Hyman opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.