Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles E. Stokes, Appellant, v. Henry Weston et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
General
Charles E. Stokes, Appellant, v. Henry Weston et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents
141 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Stokes, Appellant, v. Henry Weston et al., Impleaded, etc., Respondents.
(Argued December 15, 1893;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made June 23, 1893, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
John D. Teller for appellant.
■Franje 8. Goburn for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
69 Hun, 608.