Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION v. Steve TRUNK, et al., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 2658 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION v. Steve TRUNK, et al.
134 S. Ct. 2658189 L. Ed. 2d 849·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION
v.
Steve TRUNK, et al.
No. 13-1061.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 30, 2014.
The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.
Statement of Justice ALITO respecting the denial of the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment.
This case came before us two years ago, see 567 U.S. ----, 132 S.Ct. 2535, 183 L.Ed.2d 692 (2012), and at that time I issued a statement respecting the denial of certiorari. I noted that although the "Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence is undoubtedly in need of clarity," certiorari was not yet warranted in this case "[b]ecause no final judgment has been rendered and it remains unclear precisely what action the Federal Government will be required to take." Id., at 2536.
Since that time, the District Court has issued an order requiring the memorial to be removed, but it has stayed that order pending appeal. The Court of Appeals has not yet reviewed that order on appeal. Seeking to bypass that step, petitioner seeks certiorari before judgment. In my view, it has not met the very demanding standard we require in order to grant certiorari at that stage. In light of the stay, any review by this Court can await the decision of the Court of Appeals. I therefore agree with the Court's decision to deny the petition.